Reflection (part 1)
This is version of an article I was asked to write for the VSO Indonesia in-house newsletter about what we think we have learned from our experience here in the last two years.
Pembelajaran
Pembelajaran (lessons)
It would be all too easy to finish one’s placement and rush home to the bosom of one’s family, cheeks moist with tears, and in all the excitement forget to reflect on the lessons of the past two years. Thus I present my top FIVE pembelajaran (lessons) from my time in Flores:
Nothing is what it seems, and in any case it was not caused by what you supposed.
Getting to the bottom of any situation in Flores is like peeling away the layers of an onion, and just as likely to make you weep. Just when you think you have established beyond any shadow of a doubt the real state of affairs, and when all your colleagues have finally confessed to their various transgressions, a new piece of data arrives that casts doubt on everything. Furthermore, even when you get a clear grasp of the situation, your attempts at analysis will be in vain as you apply your western logical reasoning to the problem in hand. We are brought up to believe in cause and effect - the scientific logic that describes a linear sequence of events - and we encourage our colleagues to deploy this logic in problem trees and so forth. I can now reveal to you that sometimes things happen that are not part of this sequence. Flores has taught me that there is an alternate dimension that intrudes on our existence, and introduces the ‘random element’ that cannot be explained in a cause/effect flow chart. This is deeply unsettling, but is perhaps a phenomena confined to NTT.
The comparative advantage of Flores is mass catering
According to economists at the World Bank, the ‘comparative advantage’ of Indonesia is in furniture, natural gas and handicrafts. Not so with Flores. Experience at various acara (cultural events) has demonstrated to me that orang Flores can muster up a square meal (served with a plastic glass and a banana) for any number of people, irrespective of the number of people actually anticipated to arrive at the event. After many years of bitter experience as a customer of hotel catering in the UK, where the arrival of just one extra person throws an entire banquet into disarray and recrimination, it is extraordinary to see how orang Flores cope with fluid and potentially chaotic situations. Furthermore, the food is always much better than you get in any restaurant, and is served with a smile by one of the seemingly endless supply of young unmarried girls.
There is always someone worse off that the person you are talking to
No matter how remote the village, infertile the land or unhelpful the topology, your belief that you have now discovered the most disadvantaged person on the island (and therefore, possibly in the whole of Indonesia) will be shaken by the knowledge that just round the corner is someone even worse off. This is partly because your definitions of poverty are always changing, but also because people themselves have a certain amount of pride in their capacity for hospitality, and however humble the homestead, the welcome is as rich as you will receive anywhere on earth. The people you need to worry about are those you cannot see, and only rarely hear about.
The Japanese were not all bad in WW2
It may be a bizarre piece of historical revisionism, but the Japanese themselves always maintained that their invasion spree was intended to liberate Asian nations from the yoke of European colonialism. Clearly this did not make much sense in Manchuria, which was not a colony, but perhaps it did have some resonance in Flores, where the Japanese tend to be regarded with a certain amount of respect (in spite of their monopoly in the pearl trade). As the Japanese mainly left Indonesia to its own devices during the war, this ironically led to a higher degree of empowerment for native Indonesians than they had ever enjoyed under Dutch rule. Not surprising then that when the British came in 1945 to accept the Japanese surrender and to reclaim the archipelago on behalf of the Dutch, they were told to stuff it. Quite right too.
Not all ‘culture’ deserves respect
VSO do a good job of introducing the thorny issue of ‘culture’ to new recruits, and it is important to help us understand the meanings, context and importance of cultural diversity. I cannot see how any volunteer could be effective (or happy) if they decided to challenge every unusual cultural practice they encountered. That said, it can sometimes be tempting to blindly accept any cultural practice regardless of how it may sit with what can be termed ‘universal norms’ (such as human rights). Passivity dressed up as cultural sensitivity can all too easily mean conniving with the status quo and not confronting or challenging certain power structures. My frustration at certain attitudes or outcomes has often been met with a shrug, and the comment: ‘Begitulah budaya di sini’ ('that's just the culture here'). After a while, however, it occurred to me that I was here to share skills about professional business practices, and so I felt that this gave me the platform to start questioning certain practices and asking if we really mean ‘budaya’ (culture) or ‘kebiasaan’ (habit). Often, my colleagues would agree that it is the latter, and can therefore be challenged. Common (and rather unimportant) examples include: jam karet ('rubber time'), talking while someone is presenting, passive aggression, selfish driving etc., and I challenge such behaviour in Flores just as I would back in the UK. However, there are also some larger cultural forces at work which are more ingrained and harder to challenge, e.g. hierarchy, gender. One needs to accept that these change over very long periods of time, and little progress can be made by pointing out how ‘backward’ these cultural viewpoints appear to western eyes. After all, the west is also plagued by unhelpful cultural practices and would find it hard to claim that the Enlightenment made us all rational. A quick glance at the current USA regime will demonstrate that ignorance, arrogance and love of patronage can still dominate apparently 'civilised' societies, with woeful implications for the less powerful in the world.











Recent Comments